Archive for the ‘G&A Opinion Editorials’ Category

GOVERNMENT AS USUAL IN SACRAMENTO COUNTY

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010

Sacramento County has given us yet another piece of evidence that certain elected officials and managers of California government entities have devolved into nothing more than their own personal existence justification system. Over the last three years we have repeatedly seen government managers go to extraordinary lengths to protect themselves and their friends.

On Wednesday, May 26, 2010, the Sacramento Bee reported that during 2009, the number of Sacramento County’s highest paid employees significantly increased. Yes, that’s right, increased. During the worst fiscal crisis in Sacramento County’s history the number of Sacramento County employees making over $100,000.00 a year in base salary increased. Remember, for the last three years Sacramento County has had budget deficients over $100 million.

Sacramento County officials were quick to defend themselves by saying that the salary increase were the result of collective bargaining agreements they have no control over. However, what is clear is Sacramento County leaders and most government officials do not want that control. They do not want to make hard decisions that are necessary in today’s economic climate. Government officials are quick to slap a band-aid on the severed artery by furloughing employees, laying off some of the lowest paid employees and attempting to freeze wage or benefit increases. Government leaders hold on from one pay period to the next, use smoke and mirrors to pay their bills, all while fending off difficult questions as to why they are making the decisions they make. Here is what drives them: Sacramento County officials and most government leaders first and foremost want to protect themselves and their closest allies and friends. In Sacramento County’s case that starts

with supervisors and goes to the County Administrator’s office. They refuse to recognize the obvious solution which is significant parts of their governmental empires have to permanently go away. A massive restructuring of California government must occur so that these government entities can provide the basic, fundamental, and indispensable services they are required to provide.

I for one want more government workers on the streets doing the actual work and less bureaucrats thinking of ways to justify their existence. Some form of real leadership needs to arise arises in California state and local governments for it’s fiscal problems to be fixed.

“Your Call Will Be Answered By A REAL LIVE PERSON!” (how novel!)

Friday, April 16th, 2010

I know as a consumer, one of the most irritating phenomenon of the modern age is calling a labyrinth of never ending extensions only to be hung up on you after you’ve invested 20 minutes trying to find the right person. The other phenomenon is that companies use the slogan “talk to a REAL LIVE PERSON” as a marketing ploy- the equivalent to throwing in a “set of steak knives” when you purchase a blender or a cookbook. It shouldn’t be a marketing ploy, it should just be expected as part of good service and here at G&A, it is.

Now you know if you’ve been a long time client of G&A’s or if you’ve just recently had need to call us, that your call is answered by one of our amazing staff members: Gayle (she’s our receptionist) Lisa or Wendy (our stellar legal secretaries) Sue (our matriarch and office manager) or Jen (me). You also know who you’re calling because we don’t refer to ourselves as “Law Office”, so you know you’ve actually reached the right place and most of the time you know exactly who you’re talking to because we tell you our names!

You may also have been impressed (or shocked in some cases) that we do not have voice mail. A few years ago this may have made us seem antiquated, but after years of being dumped into impersonal voicemail systems which may or may not elicit a return call, our approach is refreshing! You know that the attorney you’ve called will get the message, because you can trust our staff to deliver it. You can also trust them to go above and beyond to help you right then and there if we can.  So thank you to one of our clients for recognizing the extra effort the staff of G&A make every day to ensure our clients feel well taken care of… and until there is an automated system that can look through 2 HUGE files for a client, I think we will keep Gayle!

From: Dan

Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 7:28 AM

To: Gayle

Subject: Re: Status of your matter

Gayle,

                Thought you’d like to see this… good job, as always.


From: Troy

Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 7:28 AM
To: Daniel Thompson
Subject: Re: Status of your matter

                Hello Dan,

Just in case you were wondering, the reason I called your office to get the information from the notice of discipline was to use the information in a rebuttal to my annual review. Couldn’t find my original copy so your receptionist was kind enough to read the paragraph to me. Now that’s service!

                Thanks for doing such a great job on my behalf!!
                Warm regards,

                Troy


Letter To Prospective Client: International Fraudulent Adoption

Thursday, April 15th, 2010

Ms. Hansen,

You are not alone. Many parents who have put their hearts and families on the line to bring home an older child from another country, have found themselves duped by the only people they had to trust–orphanages and the adoption agencies they work with. The only people who really know– and have the opportunity to know– your prospective child’s mental and physical health are those that purport to take care of him every day in the country you are adopting from, and those adoption agencies here who are supposed to ensure the information given to you about your child is accurate and as complete as is available. If those people fail you, you are lost, because you do not have the information you need to make sound choices about who you wish to make part of your family.

The United States, while purporting to adopt stringent standards pursuant to the Hague Convention regarding the rights of intercountry adoptive parents and prospective children, has failed to fully investigate intercountry adoptions on a case by case basis, and have failed to enforce their own rules regarding intercountry adoption. While families here are put through rigorous evaluations to ensure they are suitable parents for the children they seek to adopt, the agencies and their affiliated orphanages in other countries are not as meticulously inspected or evaluated. Tragically, there are too many stories like your own, Ms. Hansen, about the fraudulent withholding of critical information regarding a child’s mental or medical condition that causes the adoptive family to find itself completely unprepared for what awaits them.

I hope that because of your story and others, this country will take up its duty to fully investigate all intercountry adoptions so that no family or child has to go through this type of ordeal again– and that the agencies are held accountable when they go wrong.

Francesca Gianuario

Goyette & Associates Inc. Attorneys at Law Office

What Is Going On In The Legal World And How It Affects You

Friday, February 5th, 2010

Goyette & Associatiates Ezine 2-10

In This Issue:

  • What Paul and the G&A Team are up to:  Tons of growth that directly benefits you and your organization!
  • Featured Article:  Citizens United Case Impact on Your Organization
  • What to Watch Out For: New Legislation coming down the pipes
  • Weigh In On This One: What do you think about the new helmet law for kids on the slopes

CalPERS Long Term Care (LTC) Insurance Update

Friday, October 23rd, 2009

The CalPERS LTC Fund is in serious financial trouble.  The LTC Board has determined that swift action to improve the fiscal health of the Long Term Care Program is imperative. 

Two actions will take place immediately, the first being that there will be no open enrollment program, nor will any new policies be issued until the fund conditions improve.  The second will be an increase in rates of 15% to 20% for current policy holders next year.

CalPERS will be sending this information to CalPERS members this week.

GOVERNMENT MUST BEGIN TO DISMANTLE ITS MASSIVE BUREAUCRACY

Monday, October 19th, 2009

The response of government to its spending habits during this Great Recession is disappointing to say the least. The State of California and local government entities throughout California are grappling with history budget shortfalls. Quarter after quarter financial experts report to these government entities that their tax revenues are falling short of expectations. The government responds with a series of shortsighted actions such as pay cuts and furloughs of its workforce and the reduction of services to some of California’s most needy residents. While these cost saving measures may get the government temporarily through those short term budget periods, they have obliterated the productivity of the employee workforce, aggravated existing social problems while only temporarily solving their financial problems. The leaders of these government entities have lost sight of a fundamental question. That question is as follows: “Why are we here?” Put another way, government leaders for the most part have refused to focus on the fundamental reasons their government entity exists in the first place. What are the indispensable services and protections that each government entity must provide California?

The reason our elected officials have not publically asked these questions, let alone taken action on them, is because to do so would produce a clear but painful solution for California’s elected officials and its managers that run California governments. The solution is clear: Dismantle the massive bureaucracy that strangles government and prevents it from carrying out its mission.

HOW DID WE GET HERE?

There are several reasons the government finds itself in its current financial mess. First, the government has grown to an unsustainable size. Between 1998 and 2008 California State and local governments have grown exponentially. In fact, this ten year period has produced five times faster growth in government than any other previous decade. Governments have added a myriad of programs and specialized jobs. They have also added massive numbers of employees at all levels.

Term limits for California politicians is another significant problem. In another glaring example of why the California ballot initiative process rarely works, the legacy of term limits will be the growth of government without leaders. From the minute a state politician is elected to office he or she immediately begins planning for their next political job. After all, they will only have a limited number of years in their current position. Therefore, politicians are afraid to make tough decisions. They are driven by public perception and polls. In short, they are incapable of being leaders. They are not vested for the long term. They are a group of yes men and women, who never want to be the bad guy, and never want to say no. Consequently, on both sides of the aisle they have said “yes” to a massive buildup in government bureaucracy.

Macro-economics is another very important factor that has led to California’s government malaise. Apparently, California’s leaders have chosen to ignore or simply do not know some basic laws of economics. The economy of the United States and California is driven by consumer spending. According to the Department of Consumer Affairs, almost 70% of the nation’s gross national product is now consumer spending. Compare that with the 1950’s whereover 2/3rds of the GNP was manufacturing. For today’s economy to grow, consumers must always spend in increasing amount of their money. In other words, for the economy to grow consumer spending must grow. Consumers long ago exhausted any surplus income they might have had. For the last 20 years, consumer spending has been driven by the credit market. Whether it be credit cards or home refinancing consumer spending, especially on big ticket items, was only possible because of the credit made available to consumers. Well, as we know, the credit house of cards has collapsed and will not be coming back.

Another significant factor causing government’s current problems was the assumption that the taxpayer could always pay more to government. All government is supported by the taxpayer–the private sector taxpayer. Taxes paid by government employees only support a fraction of government operations. The private sector taxpayer has always funded government. Today, in many sectors, the private sector has been radically reduced if not completely wiped out. In most cases, the taxpayer is not available to bail out government this time.

WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?

The starting point for any solution is that government managers and elected officials must ask the fundamental question: Why are we here and what are the fundamental and indispensable services we must provide California? If those managers and officials answer that question honestly they will recognize that large pieces of the bureaucracies they have created simply are not necessary.